公开个人画像 · HUMAN3 V1

关系优先的自由生活建设者

渴望与重要的人共同生活,也渴望通过美食、创作与旅行把人生主动权拿回来。

生活原型 Specialist Integrated 专长者,走向整合
69心智 Mind
52身体 Body
65关系 Spirit
78事业 Vocation
认识我 查看数据画像

类型与分数是当前阶段的结构化观察,不是永久标签,也不是诊断或排名。

理想生活插画:海边钓鱼的粗蜡笔贴纸风
理想生活一瞥:海边、房车、与重要的人一起——插画装饰,向下滚动即可认识完整的我。

01

理想生活与价值观

这幅画面是价值观的压缩包:想要怎样的一天,也就透露了真正在意什么。

不必坐班,仍做美食与内容

白天做自己想做的产出,而不是围着固定工位转。

一起开房车旅行

和重要的人上路,把「共同生活」做成日常,而不只是周末约会。

海边钓鱼与亲手早餐

慢一点的早晨:自己做吃的,让身体和心情先落地。

围坐分享食物与故事

不同背景的人围一桌,用食物打开连接。

不必固定上班,仍做美食与内容创作;与重要的人一起开房车旅行;海边钓鱼、亲手做早餐;与不同地方来的人围坐分享食物、听故事。

我真正在意的排序

  1. 1
    稳定亲密关系

    真实选择里持续排第一;想要一段能一起承载自由的关系。

  2. 2
    自由与旅行

    最终生活画面的核心:地点与时间自由,而不是永远被固定班次绑住。

  3. 3
    经济安全(工具,不是终点)

    钱是工具,用来撑起想过的日子,不是人生唯一答案。

  4. 4
    创作与表达

    需要把经验、观点与情绪变成可分享的内容。

  5. 5
    新鲜体验与人际连接

    喜欢新地方、新故事,也喜欢和人围坐分享食物。

核心张力:想要一段能一起承载自由的关系——两端都不是错,缺的是可长期承载两端的生活结构。 曾以为自由会排第一,但真实选择持续把稳定关系放在更前——这不是矛盾,而是当前最重要的张力。

一起怎样:需要质量时间,也需要独处充电;更吃行动一致,而不是口号。

02

四象限状态

心智、身体、关系与事业——点开每张卡,可看阶段、优势、张力、下一步与证据。

03

我如何思考、生活、连接与工作

四组短卡,不是大段人格标签。

🧠

我如何思考

重事实、多次验证、限定适用范围,愿意在冷静后修正。

🌅

我如何生活

爱美食、旅行、社交和有趣的运动,不喜欢单调重复。

💛

我如何连接

付出型,重视陪伴、公开关系、透明度和共同未来;关系不确定时容易过度投入。

🛠️

我如何工作

学习快,会把新工具变成实际产出;喜欢带队、多项目融会贯通、面向真实反馈做事。

04

能力通道

公开版只谈能力模式与验证闭环,不复述可识别履历。

🍳

美食与餐厅

手艺 × 经营反馈

  • 擅长 把热爱做成可验证的出品与经营闭环
  • 在验证 复购、客单与可持续工时
  • 合作 适合能一起盯现场反馈、愿意小步试错的合作
✍️

内容表达

观点 × 情绪 × 表达

  • 擅长 把经验与情绪写成有生命力的内容
  • 在验证 稳定输出与真实语气,而不是跟风夸张
  • 合作 适合尊重表达风格、一起打磨叙事的人
🤖

AI 应用

提效 × 研究 × 创作

  • 擅长 靠对话自学,把 AI 落到自动化、研究与创作产出
  • 在验证 是否真的省时、能复用到美食与内容
  • 合作 适合一起把工具变成流程,而不是只聊概念

它们如何互相增强

AI 能力→内容效率 / 餐厅运营
做菜与餐厅→内容素材 / 现实商业验证
内容表达→获客 / 个人品牌 / 影响力

最违背自己的安排

兴趣、自主权与成长空间都很弱的高稳定安排——安全有价值,却不该变成无限期默认。

主题:从靠硬撑保住一切,转向建立可承载的自由生活系统——不是缺方向,是缺能同时承载关系、创造与自由的系统。

05

核心张力与边界

两端都不是错。目标是建立能长期承载两端的生活结构。

亲密稳定
自由流动
安全保障
自主选择
多项目热情
有限精力
外部反馈
内在价值
低成本试错
缺少系统验证
愿意修正
受伤时先防御

相处边界(概括)

  • 需要共同生活意愿;不太适合长期「只线上一周见一次」的关系预期。
  • 经济安全是工具;不太适合把「唯一稳定岗位」当成人生答案来施压。
  • 合作上要真实反馈与闭环;不太适合只聊概念、从不落地。
  • 精力续航有限;需要可预期的休息与边界,而不是无限硬撑。
  • 透明度与质量时间很重要;隐瞒或长期回避共同未来规划会很难继续。

结构偏好(不含具体事件)

  • 硬边界 持续隐瞒或欺骗
  • 硬边界 长期拒绝公开承认关系
  • 硬边界 长期拒绝共同生活或共同未来规划
  • 硬边界 持续贬低且拒绝修复
  • 高冲突 伴侣不接受长期旅行或地点自由目标
  • 待补数据 生育立场未知

06

次级深入

默认折叠。主路径读到边界,应已能回答:她是谁 / 在意什么 / 一起怎样 / 谁不合适。

我正在推进的事 (建议,不是已承诺计划)

此刻:建一页经营看板,保护四件事:关系质量、餐厅闭环、身体恢复、自由跑道。每项定一个周指标,超载就调整,不硬撑。

近 30 天

  • 建议 开业起就记:日订单、客单、食材成本、损耗、复购、获客与工时。
  • 建议 守住身体底线:规律进食、稳定睡眠窗口、每周至少一次喜欢的运动。
  • 建议 用固定高质量相处保护关系,而不是把所有剩余时间默认交给关系。
  • 建议 内容坚持真实语气,不以极端或违背自己为增长前提。

近 90 天

  • 建议 先验证餐厅是否有真实复购与可持续毛利,再谈扩张。
  • 建议 把餐厅与美食内容合成一条闭环:产品→故事→反馈→内容→到店。
  • 建议 建立至少一种不依赖对方即时确认的恢复方式。
  • 建议 对当前高稳定安排做一次季度复盘:安全是否仍大于时间与成长损失。

6–12 个月

  • 建议 构建适合旅行的收入组合,而不是只等一个数字一次性到位。
  • 建议 做一次至少两周的真实移动生活实验,同时维持工作与关系节奏。
  • 建议 只有利润、复购、委派和工时都验证后,才考虑规模化。
  • 建议 把共同未来从情绪确认,变成可讨论的时间、地点与责任安排。
匹配实验室 · Beta(非正式) — 正式关系匹配与对方采集以框架 V2 为准;本页暂不把匹配作为完成项。 若你有同 schema 的 JSON,可日后再用本地工具比对。结构化事实源已升 V2;本页为脱敏公开包。

07

数据画像

23 项公开坐标(已按 V2 去掉 private)。可筛选类别;分数旁可看重要度与置信度。敏感原始回答已过滤。

坐标类别分数重要度置信度可接受范围一句话

下载:公开画像 JSON(已脱敏)

08

问我一句

次级入口。用第一人称「我」聊公开文案;不代替认真相处,也不做宿命匹配结论。

Averie
基于公开脱敏文案 · 服务端代理
嗨,我是 Averie。你可以问我在意什么、理想生活,或一起怎样相处。履历细节我不会展开。

回答不构成承诺或诊断。密钥不在前端。

const EMBED = {"evidence": {"metatype": {"title": "为什么是「关系优先的自由生活建设者」","type": "分析推断","confidence": 0.84,"answers": [{"label": "价值排序","text": "稳定亲密关系排第一,自由旅行第二;真实选择持续把关系放在前面。"},{"label": "……一天","text": "不必固定上班,仍做美食与内容创作;与重要的人一起开房车旅行;海边钓鱼、亲手做早餐;与不同地方来的人围坐分享食物、听故事。"},{"label": "能力路径","text": "美食、内容与 AI 应用构成通往自由生活的现实通道。"}],"alt": "也可能被读成「事业驱动的旅行者」——但强制取舍里关系与共同生活始终优先。","missing": "生育立场、旅行后长期居住地等仍会修正这一画像的边界。"},"tension": {"title": "为什么说「关系第一 vs 曾以为自由第一」是核心张力","type": "自我解释 + 分析推断","confidence": 0.9,"answers": [{"label": "口头排序","text": "曾以为自由会排第一。"},{"label": "真实选择","text": "高代价取舍里,稳定关系持续被放在更前。"},{"label": "目标表述","text": "想要一段能一起承载自由的关系——两端都不是错,缺的是可长期承载两端的生活结构。"}],"alt": "短期压力下也可能暂时把经济安全推到更前。","missing": "共同未来的具体时间表与地点安排尚未公开验证。"},"mind": {"title": "为什么这样看「心智 Mind」","type": "分析推断(基于自述)","confidence": 0.86,"answers": [{"label": "题 5","text": "Rejects universal AI replacement claims by limiting them to organizational context, especially larger organizations and relationship-heavy work."},{"label": "题 6","text": "Initially moved toward a more stable arrangement partly due to AI displacement fears; later concluded capable people and human collaborative work are not simply replaced."},{"label": "题 7","text": "Changed toward a more stable role without fully knowing conditions; prioritized stability, parents' reassurance and marriage plans; now often regrets it and recognizes post-hoc rationalization."},{"label": "题 8","text": "Did not internalize criticism from a leader judged incompetent and did not change behavior because the role feels meaningless and non-diagnostic of personal value."},{"label": "题 9","text": "Learned applied AI through dialogue and work use, gaining job opportunities and differentiation; estimates about half of work remains possible without generative AI."},{"label": "题 30","text": "Perceived rejection or replacement triggers abandonment interpretation, emotional swings, insomnia/overeating, attempted detachment through other people or activities, and recovery after reassurance from the important person."}],"alt": "也可能是:高压时信息搜索变窄,而不是能力本身不足。","missing": "缺少系统化的外部反例与决策复盘日志。"},"body": {"title": "为什么这样看「身体 Body」","type": "分析推断(基于自述)","confidence": 0.9,"answers": [{"label": "题 10","text": "Usually 23:00-06:40; recent anxiety reduces sleep quality; energy generally average; may avoid sleep because recovery feels like wasted time."},{"label": "题 11","text": "Regular meals and nutrition awareness; generally likes appearance; local body dissatisfaction affects mood moderately; taste ranks first in food decisions."},{"label": "题 12","text": "Good coordination base from childhood aerobics; current muscle, stamina and energy are insufficient; high-altitude hiking has been limited; endurance is desired."},{"label": "题 13","text": "Anxiety, insomnia and possible overeating; minimum habit under high stress is eating something."},{"label": "题 25","text": "Workday 06:40-23:00, with roughly 3 hours daily driving commute and 2-hour lunch; evenings and weekends mainly with partner; about 2 social evenings weekly, 3 hours gaming, 1 hour exercise, 5-7 hours cooking, 4 hours podcast and 4 hours restaurant work."},{"label": "题 27","text": "Would reduce everything except restaurant and relationship; minimum line is restaurant, food and romance; would continue pushing through overload to avoid losing either."}],"alt": "也可能是:项目过载暂时压住了本可维持的节律。","missing": "长周期耐力与开店高峰期的恢复数据。"},"spirit": {"title": "为什么这样看「关系与意义 Spirit」","type": "分析推断(基于自述)","confidence": 0.89,"answers": [{"label": "题 14","text": "Even without relationship, work success, projects, recognition or retirement goals, the unseen parts of the world make life worth continuing."},{"label": "题 15","text": "Family supports nearly all choices and mainly wants health and happiness; the stability-oriented choice reassured family and is tolerable despite low personal fit."},{"label": "题 16","text": "Partner is primary long-term support; business partner provides cooperation and emotional value; colleagues provide daily conversation; other relationships may be neglected when romance is going well."},{"label": "题 17","text": "High shared-time preference; transparency and no concealment; public relationship and cohabitation required; mostly AA finances with greater male contribution if domestic labor is unequal; shared future prioritized; repair requires mutual understanding and restored affection."},{"label": "题 18","text": "Gaming and zoning out support recovery; enjoys solitude for about half a day; nature is the strongest source of awe, with arts and culture also meaningful."},{"label": "题 28","text": "Describes self as freedom-seeking, broadly interested, curious about the world, socially oriented, giving/helpful, praise- and spotlight-responsive, food-loving, highly invested in romance and prone to low mood."}],"alt": "也可能是:高投入依恋在匹配关系里是优势,在不确定关系里变成消耗。","missing": "生育立场、旅行后长期居住地等关键项仍未知。"},"vocation": {"title": "为什么这样看「事业与创造 Vocation」","type": "分析推断(基于自述)","confidence": 0.92,"answers": [{"label": "题 19","text": "Built layered skills from structured thinking and content expression into frontline feedback-driven work, then a higher-stability analysis role; feedback-rich collaborative work felt most authentic, high-stability low-autonomy roles least authentic."},{"label": "题 20","text": "Overall around 5/10; stable but low-interest, low-growth and low-upside; colleagues acceptable, leader poor; main benefit is security and some time for personal projects."},{"label": "题 21","text": "Learning agility, emotionally alive content expression and commercial judgment; strongest evidence is cross-domain AI/data automation, while content and business judgment need more repeated market validation."},{"label": "题 22","text": "Wants team collaboration with leadership authority, partial routine plus novel problems, less-stable project work, public expression, management plus chosen creation, multiple integrated projects and about 40 hours weekly; would still cook/run a restaurant after financial freedom."},{"label": "题 23","text": "Restaurant is childhood dream and intended chain; food content shares useful experiences; AI podcast supports transition, impact and fear of being left behind; would keep restaurant and food content if forced to choose."},{"label": "题 24","text": "Needs at least (金额已脱敏) stable monthly income; current acceptable entrepreneurial loss about (金额已脱敏); resignation threshold remains 停止固定工作的心理许可阶段; would continue a loved but unprofitable project for one year; prefers low-cost experiments."}],"alt": "也可能是:多项目热情暂时领先于单一赛道的深度验证。","missing": "开业后的真实复购、毛利与可委派工时。"}},"coords": [{"id": "relationship_priority","category": "values","label": "稳定亲密关系优先度","score": 94,"importance": 98,"confidence": 0.96,"range": [75,100],"one_liner": "把稳定亲密关系放在价值排序的最前面。","evidence_questions": [2,17,27,35]},{"id": "freedom_travel","category": "values","label": "自由与旅行驱动力","score": 91,"importance": 93,"confidence": 0.94,"range": [60,100],"one_liner": "渴望地点与时间自由,旅行是最终生活画面的核心。","evidence_questions": [1,2,14,35]},{"id": "food_craft_identity","category": "values","label": "美食与烹饪身份强度","score": 96,"importance": 97,"confidence": 0.98,"range": null,"one_liner": "美食与烹饪是最稳定的身份锚点。","evidence_questions": [1,4,23,29,35]},{"id": "creative_expression","category": "values","label": "创作与表达需求","score": 76,"importance": 74,"confidence": 0.85,"range": [35,100],"one_liner": "需要把经验与情绪转化为可表达的内容。","evidence_questions": [4,21,22,23,32]},{"id": "recognition_impact","category": "values","label": "认可与影响力需求","score": 75,"importance": 70,"confidence": 0.86,"range": null,"one_liner": "在意认可与影响力,但不愿为此扭曲真实风格。","evidence_questions": [23,28,32]},{"id": "novelty_exploration","category": "values","label": "新体验与探索需求","score": 79,"importance": 78,"confidence": 0.88,"range": [45,100],"one_liner": "喜欢新体验、不同文化与新鲜连接。","evidence_questions": [1,2,14,18,22]},{"id": "family_closeness","category": "values","label": "家庭亲近需求","score": 73,"importance": 79,"confidence": 0.83,"range": [45,100],"one_liner": "家庭总体高支持;安全期待会影响重大选择。","evidence_questions": [15,32]},{"id": "social_engagement","category": "lifestyle","label": "社交参与需求","score": 72,"importance": 67,"confidence": 0.85,"range": [35,100],"one_liner": "享受社交,但网络激活程度常随恋爱状态波动。","evidence_questions": [1,16,18,25,28]},{"id": "solitude_tolerance","category": "lifestyle","label": "独处耐受度","score": 43,"importance": 45,"confidence": 0.88,"range": [25,70],"one_liner": "能享受约半天独处,长期独处不是……。","evidence_questions": [18]},{"id": "multi_project_preference","category": "lifestyle","label": "多项目组合偏好","score": 86,"importance": 82,"confidence": 0.92,"range": [40,100],"one_liner": "喜欢多项目并行与融会贯通。","evidence_questions": [22,23,25]},{"id": "routine_preference","category": "lifestyle","label": "固定结构偏好","score": 44,"importance": 48,"confidence": 0.78,"range": [20,75],"one_liner": "不太喜欢高度固定的单调结构。","evidence_questions": [1,22,24]},{"id": "health_priority","category": "lifestyle","label": "健康在现实取舍中的优先度","score": 42,"importance": 68,"confidence": 0.9,"range": null,"one_liner": "知道健康重要,但忙碌时容易后置。","evidence_questions": [10,11,13,27]},{"id": "recovery_discipline","category": "capacity","label": "主动恢复能力","score": 32,"importance": 88,"confidence": 0.94,"range": null,"one_liner": "主动恢复仍是明显短板。","evidence_questions": [10,13,27,30]},{"id": "learning_agility","category": "vocation","label": "学习迁移能力","score": 93,"importance": 92,"confidence": 0.96,"range": null,"one_liner": "跨领域学习与迁移能力突出。","evidence_questions": [6,9,21,31]},{"id": "execution_capacity","category": "vocation","label": "项目执行能力","score": 83,"importance": 88,"confidence": 0.93,"range": null,"one_liner": "能把想法推进成现实项目。","evidence_questions": [19,21,23,24,29]},{"id": "leadership_preference","category": "vocation","label": "领导与决策权偏好","score": 87,"importance": 82,"confidence": 0.9,"range": [30,100],"one_liner": "偏好领导、决策与可见表达。","evidence_questions": [22]},{"id": "entrepreneurial_drive","category": "vocation","label": "创业驱动力","score": 85,"importance": 89,"confidence": 0.93,"range": [35,100],"one_liner": "创业与开店驱动力强。","evidence_questions": [23,24,31,35]},{"id": "content_expression_skill","category": "vocation","label": "内容表达能力","score": 78,"importance": 78,"confidence": 0.84,"range": null,"one_liner": "文字与内容表达有生命力。","evidence_questions": [21,22,23,33]},{"id": "commercial_intuition","category": "vocation","label": "商业直觉","score": 72,"importance": 84,"confidence": 0.78,"range": null,"one_liner": "对选址、营销与自然流量有敏感度。","evidence_questions": [21,23,24,34]},{"id": "business_systemization","category": "vocation","label": "商业系统化能力","score": 59,"importance": 83,"confidence": 0.82,"range": null,"one_liner": "经营直觉领先于系统化测量。","evidence_questions": [23,24,31,34]},{"id": "low_cost_experimentation","category": "vocation","label": "低成本试错倾向","score": 90,"importance": 88,"confidence": 0.95,"range": [50,100],"one_liner": "用小额实验控制下行风险。","evidence_questions": [23,24,31,34]},{"id": "feedback_receptivity","category": "mind","label": "具体反馈吸收能力","score": 71,"importance": 73,"confidence": 0.8,"range": null,"one_liner": "能吸收具体、可信的反馈。","evidence_questions": [8,33]},{"id": "adaptability","category": "mind","label": "环境适应与方法更新","score": 74,"importance": 82,"confidence": 0.86,"range": null,"one_liner": "能在发现方法失效后更新做法。","evidence_questions": [5,6,7,9,34]}],"cat_cn": {"values": "价值观","lifestyle": "生活方式","relationship": "关系","vocation": "工作与创造","stress": "压力与恢复","mind": "认知","capacity": "能力容量","communication": "沟通","finance": "风险与财务","growth": "成长与执行","body": "身体"}};y": "身体"}}; /* Nav / TOC */ const nav = document.getElementById('nav'); const burger = document.getElementById('burger'); const toc = document.getElementById('toc'); burger.addEventListener('click', () => { const open = nav.classList.toggle('open'); burger.setAttribute('aria-expanded', open ? 'true' : 'false'); toc.hidden = !open; }); toc.querySelectorAll('a').forEach(a => a.addEventListener('click', () => { nav.classList.remove('open'); burger.setAttribute('aria-expanded','false'); toc.hidden = true; })); /* Quadrant expand */ document.querySelectorAll('[data-toggle-quad]').forEach(btn => { btn.addEventListener('click', () => { const id = btn.getAttribute('data-toggle-quad'); const card = btn.closest('.quad-card'); const body = document.getElementById('quad-body-' + id); const open = body.hasAttribute('hidden'); body.hidden = !open; btn.setAttribute('aria-expanded', open ? 'true' : 'false'); card.classList.toggle('open', open); }); }); /* Evidence modal */ const modal = document.getElementById('evidence-modal'); function openEvidence(key) { const ev = EMBED.evidence[key]; if (!ev) return; document.getElementById('ev-title').textContent = ev.title; document.getElementById('ev-type').textContent = ev.type; document.getElementById('ev-conf').textContent = Math.round(ev.confidence * 100) + '%(基于自述材料的发展性判断)'; const ol = document.createElement('ol'); (ev.answers || []).forEach(a => { const li = document.createElement('li'); li.innerHTML = '' + escapeHtml(a.label) + ' — ' + escapeHtml(a.text); ol.appendChild(li); }); const box = document.getElementById('ev-answers'); box.innerHTML = ''; box.appendChild(ol); document.getElementById('ev-alt').textContent = ev.alt || '—'; document.getElementById('ev-missing').textContent = ev.missing || '—'; modal.hidden = false; document.getElementById('ev-close').focus(); } function escapeHtml(s) { return String(s).replace(/[&<>"']/g, c => ({'&':'&','<':'<','>':'>','"':'"',"'":'''}[c])); } document.querySelectorAll('[data-evidence]').forEach(btn => { btn.addEventListener('click', () => openEvidence(btn.getAttribute('data-evidence'))); }); document.getElementById('ev-close').addEventListener('click', () => { modal.hidden = true; }); modal.addEventListener('click', e => { if (e.target === modal) modal.hidden = true; }); document.addEventListener('keydown', e => { if (e.key === 'Escape') modal.hidden = true; }); /* Coords table */ const catCn = EMBED.cat_cn; const filters = document.getElementById('coord-filters'); const tbody = document.querySelector('#coord-table tbody'); let activeCat = 'all'; const cats = ['all', ...new Set(EMBED.coords.map(c => c.category))]; cats.forEach(c => { const b = document.createElement('button'); b.type = 'button'; b.textContent = c === 'all' ? '全部' : (catCn[c] || c); b.setAttribute('aria-pressed', c === 'all' ? 'true' : 'false'); b.addEventListener('click', () => { activeCat = c; [...filters.children].forEach(x => x.setAttribute('aria-pressed', 'false')); b.setAttribute('aria-pressed', 'true'); renderCoords(); }); filters.appendChild(b); }); function renderCoords() { tbody.innerHTML = ''; EMBED.coords.filter(c => activeCat === 'all' || c.category === activeCat).forEach(c => { const tr = document.createElement('tr'); const range = Array.isArray(c.range) ? c.range[0] + '–' + c.range[1] : '—'; tr.innerHTML = ` ${escapeHtml(c.label)}
${escapeHtml(c.id)}
${escapeHtml(catCn[c.category] || c.category)}
${c.score}
${c.importance} ${Math.round(c.confidence * 100)}% ${range} ${escapeHtml(c.one_liner || '')}`; tbody.appendChild(tr); }); } renderCoords(); /* Chat */ const log = document.getElementById('chat-log'); const form = document.getElementById('chat-form'); const input = document.getElementById('chat-input'); function addBubble(text, who) { const d = document.createElement('div'); d.className = 'bubble ' + who; d.textContent = text; log.appendChild(d); log.scrollTop = log.scrollHeight; } form.addEventListener('submit', async (e) => { e.preventDefault(); const q = input.value.trim(); if (!q) return; input.value = ''; addBubble(q, 'me'); addBubble('…', 'them'); const pending = log.lastChild; try { const res = await fetch('/api/chat', { method: 'POST', headers: {'Content-Type': 'application/json'}, body: JSON.stringify({ messages: [{ role: 'user', content: q }] }) }); const data = await res.json().catch(() => ({})); pending.textContent = data.reply || data.message || data.error || '我这边暂时答不上来,你可以先往下看看理想生活和边界。'; } catch (err) { pending.textContent = '网络有点不稳。你可以先扫一遍上面的价值观和边界。'; } });